Thank you for reaching out to Microsoft Q&A forum
Based on my research, the 404 error occurs because the Graph API endpoint you’re using is correct, but the mismatch happens when conversations and threads aren’t always 1:1 in Outlook Groups. A conversation can contain multiple threads if participants change, so calling posts for only one thread may return fewer posts than what you see in the UI. The preview field shows the latest post in the conversation, even if that post belongs to a different thread.
That said, in order to avoid 404 errors and missing posts, you can use the thread-only endpoint (/groups/{group_id}/threads/{thread_id}/posts) and, if multiple threads exist, fetch posts from each thread to capture the full conversation.
Additionally, in a single Outlook conversation view, you might see messages that were actually split into multiple threads behind the scenes. For instance, if a conversation initially had everyone included (Thread A), and later someone replied only to a subset (Thread B), Outlook will display all messages in one conversation stream (since the subject didn’t change). However, Graph API will have two thread IDs, one for each subset of participants, both under the same conversation ID. Each thread’s posts list will only contain the messages for that thread’s participants.
Example: You see 6 posts in an Outlook group conversation. If 5 were part of the original thread and 1 was a side email that excluded a recipient, Graph might return 5 posts when querying Thread A, and the other 1 post is in Thread B. The conversation’s
previewcould show text from that latest post (in Thread B), but if you only pulled Thread A’s posts, you’d miss it --> leading to the scenario you observed.
Regarding your first question: Does the api call need to be modified in some way?
No, the endpoint format you’re using is correct. The issue is not with the syntax but with how identifiers are referenced. A 404 typically means the thread ID doesn’t match the conversation ID in the path, or the resource doesn’t exist under that hierarchy. To simplify and avoid mismatches, you can skip the conversation ID and use the thread-only endpoint:
GET /groups/{group_id}/threads/{thread_id}/posts
This is fully supported and often recommended for clarity.
Regarding your second question: Can 1 conversation have multiple threads or is it a 1:1 mapping in outlook? If it is a 1:1 mapping, can we directly call list threads and skip conversations?
Yes, but it’s not always 1:1. A conversation can contain multiple threads if participants change (e.g., someone replies to a subset of recipients). Outlook shows them as one conversation, but Graph splits them into separate threads under the same conversation ID.
- If your conversation truly has one thread, you can safely skip the conversation layer and work directly with threads.
- If multiple threads exist, you’ll need to fetch posts from each thread to get the full picture.
Link references:
https://v4.hkg1.meaqua.org/en-us/graph/api/resources/conversationthread?view=graph-rest-1.0
Note: Microsoft is providing this information as a convenience to you. These sites are not controlled by Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot make any representations regarding the quality, safety, or suitability of any software or information found there. Please ensure that you fully understand the risks before using any suggestions from the above link.
Hope my answer will help you, for any further concern, kindly let me know in the comment section.
If the answer is helpful, please click "Accept Answer" and kindly upvote it. If you have extra questions about this answer, please click "Comment".
Note: Please follow the steps in our documentation to enable e-mail notifications if you want to receive the related email notification for this thread.